simonlb
3
an diver's excuse to jump into hublot
Great review, hadn't read or seen more than a pic till this. definitely a a model then had to include in their lineup. I could see someone who is turned off by Hublot's normally chunky watches and is a diver seeing this model as an good excuse to own one. (Or a Hublot fan liking it on the sole basis that it's thicker than their big bang 
)
At-the-boutique short review of Hublot OCEANOGRAPHIC 4000 (731.NX.1190.RX)
“I think this new OCEANOGRAPHIC 4000 from Hublot is an incredible watch. First of all, it is a beautiful watch. It looks very robust, very strong and just really fits in well with the image of the museum here in Monaco, the Oceanographic Museum which was ...
ooohhhh!
awesome post! will have to re-read this. Have to say that Hublot is really making leaps and bounds with their recent pieces. Ask me a year ago if I would consider Hublot and I would have said no--but now..... As always, thanks for your observations Jason
Thanks a lot for the review Ken.
But sadly, I don't like this watch: too bulky, too thick... Thanks for the review! Fx
too thick...
If you really want to get a dive watch that goes deep... buy a Pita Oceana that goes as deep as 5,000 meters. But for normal wearing I still find this watch ridiculously thick. I think Hublot makes better watches, that do look good on the wrist.
Well, Pita Oceana 5000 is 21mm thick.....
... not much difference from this one. There are variety of people in this hobby, thus any brand has to make variety of watches We do respect different opinions here and that makes this world a bit more interesting. Thank you! Ken
Great report ....
I'v seen this stunning piece in Europe last week. Its amazing on reality but unfortunately too big for my 6,75" wrist :-( Thanks for sharing ......
I think it fits you very well from the pics.
Not outrageous or silly... handsome indeed!
I agree with Rei...
.. my wrist is 6,45" and I thought I could wear this proudly. Your wrist is much bigger and shouldn't be too big. This is supposed to look big Ken
Not "Forged Carbon"...
Sorry, but the model should erad "Carbon fiber" not "forged carbon"... other than that, it's a great review!
Okay, clarification...
Hi Joel, Actually, all carbon (regardless of pattern) by definition is forged. The difference is Hublot forges layers of woven carbon fibers together, while AP for example use random, loose fibers and compress them ALL together. Hope this clears it up! Be...
Txs...
I just tried to make a difference in the techniques involving carbon fibers... that, of course, have different results in finishes, even in ageing...
Not forged.
I think I've pressed this point in the past on the AP forum. No matter the composition of the carbon fibres, the process is just a moulding, not a forging. Forging is a very specific process aimed at aligning the grains in metal to the general shape of th...
I guess it's thick for a reason
It definitely looks like a beautiful watch in my opinion. The thickness and the size is not really a major issue because there are much larger watches out there such as the U-boat Flightdeck 55 mm that still looks fine on the wrist. It all depends on who'...
Have fun!
If you don't plan on diving too deep, don't worry about it Besides, you should have license or dive with instructors, right? Have fun out there! It must be so nice to bring in the camera in the waterproof case and take things in the sea....... Ken
Perfect! Surprised? Read on......
As an 'olde school' collector, I remember when Crocco's original Hublot model (quartz movement and later mechanical) combined form and function with a credible story. First rubber strap on gold watches that could be worn by Kings and Princes under a tuxed...
Agreed!
It is good to have choices, definitely! No one is required to love everything we discuss here. And I encourage and appreciate different opinions. It is good to be able to say what we want to say (note: there are some rules here, too, though...) Ken
I agree with MTF.... Thanks Ken
It obviously appeals to certain types of people like MTF stated . Thanks Ken. Wish I had the oceanographic 4000, so I could have put it to the test when I go diving lol.
That watch is quite something!
Somehow I like it even though it is too large for me, and also too expensive. Send my regards to the great staff at the boutique! - SJX
That Hublot Oceanographic 4000 is a massive beast!!
Do you know how it feels on the wrist in comparison to any of the Panerai 1000m Submersibles? Or the Richard Mille RM028 diving watch? This Hublot looks huge but I like the proportions and can't wait to try one on my wrist next time I visit the Hublot BH ...
As far as I remember...
.. much smaller (diameter wise) than 028 and lighter than Panerai But, yes, you should compare with those two - take into account the price difference, though! Ken
Great review Ken - I must confess that I have been trying to see this
watch. It intrigues me and your review only added to that. I will have to keep a closer eye on the London Boutique! Thanks Ken Andrew H
My pleasure, Andrew!
You always cover for me and once in a while let me cover the novelty IMO, this is a very nice looking diver watch! Ken
an diver's excuse to jump into hublot
Great review, hadn't read or seen more than a pic till this. definitely a a model then had to include in their lineup. I could see someone who is turned off by Hublot's normally chunky watches and is a diver seeing this model as an good excuse to own one....
Welcome to Hublot forum, simonlb!
And thank you for your comment. I agree. If you are a diver, this should be definitely one of the candidates for the next watch! Thanks again. Looking forward to your next post here Ken
thanks for the detailed review
great looking diver, but its certainly thick...thnx for sharing
Nice review
Nice review Ken and great pictures. I personally prefer the carbon version, but this is cool too. Thanks for sharing, Andrew
This is visually arresting...
A very visually arresting and impressive wristwatch! Wouldn't mind seeing it in person someday...
